My overall impression of the group project process is positive. Our group was able to collaborate effectively to produce a comprehensive and informative report. The success of the project was largely due to clear communication and the distribution of tasks that played to each member's strengths, ensuring that all contributions were valuable and timely.

What worked well was our regular check-ins and updates, which kept everyone on track and allowed for adjustments as needed. This approach was successful because it ensured continuous progress and allowed for immediate feedback on each section of the project.

If I were to do something differently next time, I would suggest implementing a more structured schedule for draft submissions to allow for more in-depth revisions. Additionally, increasing the use of collaborative tools for real-time editing could enhance the integration of the different sections of the report.

The suggestions from the "Collaboration and Group Projects" student guide were helpful, especially those regarding role assignments and conflict resolution. Based on my experience, I would add more emphasis on the use of technology to streamline collaboration, such as shared calendars for deadlines and digital platforms that allow simultaneous document editing. This could further enhance coordination and efficiency in group projects.

Overall, the project was a success, and these reflections and adjustments could make future collaborations even more effective.

Submission

              Group A, consisting of Khin Yadanar Kyaw, Sinhye Kim, James Cadei, Samantha Gonzalez, Phyu Phyu Thant, and Yufeng Feng, we worked together and study how technology affects society. Our group covered topics like social interactions, privacy, and cybersecurity, using digital tools to effectively integrate and present their findings.  I had a good experience with the group project because good teamwork contribution accomplish project on time. We all worked well together, communicated clearly, and used our skills effectively to create a detailed report. Regular check-ins kept us on track and allowed for quick changes. For future projects, I would enforce a stricter draft schedule to enhance our revisions. I would also recommend using more real-time editing tools to better combine different sections of the report. The "Collaboration and Group Projects" guide's advice on assigning roles and managing conflicts was helpful. Based on my experience, I would emphasize using technology, like shared calendars and platforms for simultaneous editing, to improve coordination and efficiency.